
{"id":170,"date":"2003-01-20T12:00:00","date_gmt":"2003-01-20T12:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/opendna.com\/?p=170"},"modified":"2003-01-20T12:00:00","modified_gmt":"2003-01-20T12:00:00","slug":"guard-of-the-panopticon","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/opendna.com\/blog\/2003\/01\/20\/guard-of-the-panopticon\/","title":{"rendered":"Guard of the Panopticon"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>One of the most insightful comments I&#8217;ve had about my current employer<br \/>\nwhen along the lines of this: <i>You&#8217;re the most paranoid person I know.<br \/>\nNow you&#8217;re a professional paranoid for The Man. It&#8217;s perfect!<\/i> There&#8217;s<br \/>\na twisted logic there that makes sense.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>\nToday I played Big Brother. I was the guy behind the proverbial (ahem!)<br \/>\nmirrored glass. I was the guy watching the screen that goes to the camera<br \/>\n that was watching you.  Yes, I was the guard of the <a href=\"http:\/\/users.rcn.com\/mackey\/thesis\/panopticon.html\">panopticon<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>\nOne of the key lessons of the day is that mass surveillance serves only to<br \/>\nadvise the distribution of resources. The cameras I watched were primarily<br \/>\nused to monitor the arrival of flights and the crowd movements of a couple<br \/>\nthousand people. Officers can be allowed to leave the inspection area to<br \/>\ntake care of other business when there are no passengers. Surveillance<br \/>\nmakes it possible to have enough advanced notice that they can be called<br \/>\nback to greet arrivals. The result is you never show up and find there&#8217;s<br \/>\nnobody to let you in.<\/p>\n<p>\nA second lesson is that the ratio of data examined to data collected is<br \/>\neffectively 1\/&infin;. Somewhere there is a computer storing the movements<br \/>\nof every one of the thousands of people who moved through the airport<br \/>\ntoday. From their approach to their movement through the airport to their<br \/>\ndeparture &#8211; every second was on camera. I don&#8217;t know how many cameras the<br \/>\nairport has but I suspect they number over a thousand. The mass of data is<br \/>\nso great it it would take over three continious years for one person to<br \/>\nexamine one day&#8217;s recordings. (Ten people? Three months.) How fast would<br \/>\nthat fill up your hard-drive? The honest truth is people aren&#8217;t very<br \/>\ninteresting to watch on a surveillance camera. All the nuances that makes<br \/>\n&#8220;people watching&#8221; fun are lost unless you get lucky. I saw someone dancing<br \/>\non the tarmac while he waited for a late flight to arrive, but the only<br \/>\nreason I noticed is I was waiting for it too. Web cams were the neat-o<br \/>\nthing a while back, but they kinda when the way of the blink tag. With<br \/>\ngood reason.<\/p>\n<p>\nSurveillance is only useful when something has happened, or you&#8217;re waiting<br \/>\nfor something specific to happen. I think that&#8217;s the problem Reality TV<br \/>\nruns into on occasion &#8211; when nothing happens, nobody watches. If we know<br \/>\nsomeone interesting is arriving we can watch them all the way through the<br \/>\nairport. In our case, so we can have them met by officers. If we want to<br \/>\nknow where someone came from (e.g. so we can send them back there) we can<br \/>\nfollow them backwards to their origin. But until someone becomes<br \/>\ninteresting, they&#8217;re just players in a film that will never be watched.<\/p>\n<p>\nThis kinda makes art\/activist adventures like the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.notbored.org\/the-scp.html\">Surveillance Camera<br \/>\nPlayers<\/a>&#8217; and <a href=\"http:\/\/www.wired.com\/news\/privacy\/0,1848,56185,00.html\">World<br \/>\nSousveillance Day<\/a> a waste when the object is security cameras and the<br \/>\naudience The Watchers because&#8230; we probably won&#8217;t notice. Those around<br \/>\nyou will though and that&#8217;s probably more important anyway. Taking a photo<br \/>\nof <i>me<\/i> in uniform, however, may result in the removal of your film<br \/>\nbecause I don&#8217;t want my face on a &#8220;Dead or Alive&#8221; poster (something that<br \/>\nnever occurs to most people), but that doesn&#8217;t have much to do with<br \/>\nsurveillance cameras.<\/p>\n<p>\nThough my employers have implemented a <a HREF=\"http:\/\/www.wired.com\/news\/conflict\/0,2100,54418,00.html\">biometric<br \/>\nsystem<\/a> or two, the experience so far is that they aren&#8217;t worth the<br \/>\ntime or money. INSPASS has effectively been cancelled, the machines gather<br \/>\ndust in the inspection area like punch-card computers. NSEERS is continued<br \/>\ndespite it&#8217;s gross inefficiencies (cost\/number of arrests) for national<br \/>\nsecurity reasons (heh).<\/p>\n<p>\nThe <a HREF=\"http:\/\/www.aclu.org\/Privacy\/Privacy.cfm?ID=11612&#38;c=130\">ACLU<br \/>\nwarns<\/a> that Americans &#8220;havent yet felt the full potential of the new<br \/>\ntechnology for invading privacy because of latent inefficiencies in how<br \/>\ngovernment and businesses handle information.&#8221; I agree, but to be honest,<br \/>\nthe more I know about how its done the more comfortable I get. One of the<br \/>\ngreatest ironies of the Pentagon&#8217;s now-notorious <a HREF=\"http:\/\/www.wired.com\/news\/politics\/0,1283,56620,00.html\">Total<br \/>\nInformation Awareness project<\/a> is that its head, Rear Adm. John<br \/>\nPoindexter, would be a target of constant detentions and searches because<br \/>\nof his felony convictions. Do you think Mr. Poindexter will reconsider<br \/>\nwhen gets deported from somewhere because of his previous convictions?<br \/>\nMaybe he doesn&#8217;t travel.<\/p>\n<p>\nIn my opinion anyone intent on undermining the such a system should be<br \/>\ncalling for zero tollerance enforcement instead of <a HREF=\"http:\/\/www.wired.com\/news\/politics\/0,1283,57253,00.html\">a<br \/>\nmoratorium on development of a single database<\/a>. Besides, it&#8217;s networks<br \/>\nof <a HREF=\"http:\/\/www.wired.com\/news\/privacy\/0,1848,57150,00.html\">databases<\/a><br \/>\nyou have to worry about, not a centralized database. Yes, it&#8217;s always the<br \/>\nprivate sector that <a HREF=\"http:\/\/www.wired.com\/news\/privacy\/0,1848,56826,00.html\">pioneers<br \/>\nthese<\/a> things in the first place. But we must remember that even when<br \/>\nmoney&#8217;s involved, <a HREF=\"http:\/\/www.wired.com\/news\/privacy\/0,1848,56623,00.html\">it&#8217;s not<br \/>\neasy to sync the person and the action<\/a> even <a HREF=\"http:\/\/www.wired.com\/news\/privacy\/0,1848,57167,00.html\">if you get<br \/>\nall the information correct<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>\nNone of which, of course, means you shouldn&#8217;t <a HREF=\"http:\/\/www.epic.org\/\">join the fight<\/a> to <a HREF=\"http:\/\/www.aclu.org\">protect your rights<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>&#8212;&#8212;<\/p>\n<p>UPDATE 01\/26\/03: The U.S. Senate&#8217;s been on an anti-Orwell roll recently<br \/>\nfirst they <a HREF=\"http:\/\/www.kuro5hin.org\/story\/2003\/1\/24\/22156\/9836\">suspended<br \/>\nfunding Total Information Awarness<\/a> and then they did the same to the<br \/>\n<a HREF=\"http:\/\/www.opendna.com\/blog1.html#88043129\">National Security<br \/>\nEntry-Exit Registration System<\/a>. Both of these programs it the presses<br \/>\nhard recently which might explain the Upper House&#8217;s special attention.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>One of the most insightful comments I&#8217;ve had about my current employer when along the lines of this: You&#8217;re the most paranoid person I know. Now you&#8217;re a professional paranoid for The Man. It&#8217;s perfect! There&#8217;s a twisted logic there that makes sense. Today I played Big Brother. I was [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"webmentions_disabled_pings":false,"webmentions_disabled":false,"activitypub_content_warning":"","activitypub_content_visibility":"","activitypub_max_image_attachments":3,"activitypub_interaction_policy_quote":"anyone","activitypub_status":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[22],"tags":[20,21,23],"class_list":["post-170","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-on-the-line","tag-immigration","tag-national-security","tag-usa"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/opendna.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/170","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/opendna.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/opendna.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/opendna.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/opendna.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=170"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/opendna.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/170\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/opendna.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=170"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/opendna.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=170"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/opendna.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=170"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}