{"id":143,"date":"2003-07-10T13:00:00","date_gmt":"2003-07-10T13:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/opendna.com\/?p=143"},"modified":"2022-11-08T12:53:32","modified_gmt":"2022-11-08T12:53:32","slug":"the-case-for-camejo-2003","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/opendna.com\/blog\/2003\/07\/10\/the-case-for-camejo-2003\/","title":{"rendered":"The Case for Camejo 2003"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>I took the <a>HREF=&#8221;http:\/\/www.opendna.com\/blog\/2003_07_06_blog1_archive.html#105789899236952<br \/>\n555&#8221;&gt;Camejo<br \/>\n2003<\/a> idea to <a HREF=\"http:\/\/www.democraticunderground.com\">Democratic<br \/>\nUnderground.com<\/a>, a Democratic Party activist bulletin board.<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>In <a>HREF=&#8221;http:\/\/www.democraticunderground.com\/discuss\/duboard.php?az=show_topic&#38;fo<br \/>\nrum=104&#38;topic_id=1133&#38;mesg_id=1133&#38;page=17&#8221;&gt;The<br \/>\nCalifornia Question<\/a> I argued that Democratic Party loyalists should<br \/>\nvote &#8220;NO&#8221; to recall Davis and then select Camejo as their preferred<br \/>\nback-up. The response was positive. Other&#8217;s reactions, of course, refined<br \/>\nthe argument.\n<\/li>\n<li><a>HREF=&#8221;http:\/\/www.democraticunderground.com\/discuss\/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&#38;for<br \/>\num=104&#38;topic_id=5827&#38;mesg_id=5827&#38;page=7&#8221;&gt;Will<br \/>\nCA Govenor&#8217;s office be won by a Green?<\/a> lays out the scenario more<br \/>\nclearly than I did.\n<\/li>\n<li><a>HREF=&#8221;http:\/\/www.democraticunderground.com\/discuss\/duboard.php?az=show_topic&#38;fo<br \/>\nrum=104&#38;topic_id=4639&#38;mesg_id=4639&#38;page=11&#8221;&gt;California<br \/>\nREcall: an attempt at a REpeat of 2000<\/a> is the dawning panic of a<br \/>\npartisan. I discover the idea of making the vote for Camejo a <a>HREF=&#8221;http:\/\/www.democraticunderground.com\/discuss\/duboard.php?az=show_topic&#38;fo<br \/>\nrum=104&#38;topic_id=4639&#38;mesg_id=4639&#38;page=11#5158&#8221;&gt;pre-emptive<br \/>\nthreat<\/a>.\n<\/li>\n<li><a>HREF=&#8221;http:\/\/www.democraticunderground.com\/discuss\/duboard.php?az=show_topic&#38;fo<br \/>\nrum=104&#38;topic_id=6056&#38;mesg_id=6056&#38;page=&#8221;&gt;The<br \/>\nCalifornia Solution<\/a> argues that Davis should resign so the Lt.Gov.<br \/>\nBustamonte will become Governor and the recall cancelled. Then Bustamonte<br \/>\nshould appoint Davis the Lt.Gov and resign so Davis is again Governor.<br \/>\nDavis could then appoint Bustamonte to Lt. Gov. and everything would be<br \/>\nthe same as in the beginning. Nevermind whether that&#8217;s either possible or<br \/>\ntollerable, the stench of <a>HREF=&#8221;http:\/\/www.democraticunderground.com\/discuss\/duboard.php?az=show_topic&#38;fo<br \/>\nrum=104&#38;topic_id=6056&#38;mesg_id=6056&#38;page=#10263&#8221;&gt;cowardice<\/a><br \/>\nshould be avoided.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Our operatives in SoCal have come up with some angles that are apparently<br \/>\nrecieving good reviews. Among these is that the selection of Camejo would<br \/>\nbe a clean break from the federal parties: it would be a clear message to<br \/>\nD.C. to shape up  NOW.  There&#8217;s also the recognition that the people who<br \/>\nhave to verify the 1 million recall signatures were appointed by Gray<br \/>\nDavis, so some schenanigans aren&#8217;t out of the question.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I took the HREF=&#8221;http:\/\/www.opendna.com\/blog\/2003_07_06_blog1_archive.html#105789899236952 555&#8221;&gt;Camejo 2003 idea to Democratic Underground.com, a Democratic Party activist bulletin board. In HREF=&#8221;http:\/\/www.democraticunderground.com\/discuss\/duboard.php?az=show_topic&#38;fo rum=104&#38;topic_id=1133&#38;mesg_id=1133&#38;page=17&#8221;&gt;The California Question I argued that Democratic Party loyalists should vote &#8220;NO&#8221; to recall Davis and then select Camejo as their preferred back-up. The response was positive. Other&#8217;s reactions, of course, refined [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"webmentions_disabled_pings":false,"webmentions_disabled":false,"activitypub_content_warning":"","activitypub_content_visibility":"","activitypub_max_image_attachments":3,"activitypub_interaction_policy_quote":"anyone","activitypub_status":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[218],"tags":[17],"class_list":["post-143","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-politics","tag-politics"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/opendna.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/143","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/opendna.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/opendna.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/opendna.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/opendna.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=143"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/opendna.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/143\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1945,"href":"https:\/\/opendna.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/143\/revisions\/1945"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/opendna.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=143"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/opendna.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=143"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/opendna.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=143"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}